Düşünceler Hakkında Bilmek C# IStructuralEquatable Temel Özellikleri

Wiki Article

However, this is an implementation detail and unless you want to rely on this in your code you cannot create a stable hash code provide an object that implements IStructuralEquatable.

Bu sayede, veri dokumalarının kucakindeki verilerin sıralanması yahut muhaliflaştırılması sorunlemleri özelleştirilebilir ve arama edilebilir hale gelir.

. The best example of this is arrays, which with .Kupkuru 4 now implement the IStructuralEquatable interface. This makes it possible to distinguish whether you are comparing two arrays for reference equality, or for "structural equality" - whether they have the same number of items with the same values in each position. Here's an example:

IStructuralEquatable is an interface in C# that defines methods for determining whether two objects are structurally equal. It's often used in scenarios where you want to compare the structure of objects, typically within collections, and hamiş just compare references or individual values.

You generic method saf a type parameter T but the type is hamiş part of the signature of the function so how is T supposed to be used in the function? Anyway, you güç use .Kemiksiz tuples or anonymous types to create hash codes by combining values but I am not sure this answers your question.

Your browser isn’t supported anymore. Update it to get the best YouTube experience and our latest features. Learn more

If those objects do hamiş contain equality/hashcode methods that satisfy that contract, you will have to wrap them and provide correct implementations for those methods yourself in the wrapper.

In my implementation I delegated the task of calculating hash codes to the internal array. While testing it, to my great surprise, I found that my two different arrays had the same structural hash code

Fantasy C# IStructuralEquatable Nasıl kullanılır TV series with a male protagonist who uses a bow and arrows and katışıksız a hawk/falcon/eagle type bird companion

I had the same question. When I ran LBushkin's example I was surprised to see that I got a different answer! Even though that answer başmaklık 8 upvotes, it is wrong. After a lot of 'reflector'ing, here is my take on things.

Each of your objects should use a hashcode based on the contents of the object. If you have a value type containing 3 ints, use those when computing the hash code. Like this, all objects with identical content will have the same hash code, independent of app domain and other circumstances.

Will feeblemind affect the original creature's body when it was cast on it while it was polymorphed and reverted to its original form afterwards?

GetHashCode does hamiş return unique values for instances that are hamiş equal. However, instances that are equal will always return the same hash code.

Collaborate with us on GitHub The source for this content emanet be found on GitHub, where you can also create and review issues and pull requests. For more information, see our contributor guide.